The government is at a crossroads when it comes to UFO / UAP policy. Congress continues to work behind the scenes on the UFO problem, and The UAP Caucus is helping influence not only policy but in helping to educate the American electorate. The founder of the UAP Caucus, Lester Nare, and the Head of Legislative Relations, Ronak Patel, join us.
Afterward we take another dive into The Guerrilla Skeptics and the host of @QuirkZone , Jim Quirk joins us to discus The Guerrilla Skeptics, the debunkers and more.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
About The UAP Caucus:
At the forefront of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) advocacy and research, UAP Caucus stands as a beacon of innovation, collaboration, and transparency. Founded with the mission to bridge the gap between scientific inquiry, public interest, and legislative action, UAP Caucus is dedicated to fostering an informed, open dialogue on UAPs and their implications for science, technology, national security, and human understanding.
Rooted in the belief that the mysteries surrounding UAPs demand a multidisciplinary approach, UAP Caucus leverages a network of professionals from a diverse array of fields including aerospace, astrophysics, engineering, public policy, and more. By synthesizing technical knowledge with policy advocacy and the public interest, UAP Caucus aims to drive forward a national and global conversation that is grounded in rigor, evidence, and inclusivity.
UAP Caucus is not only a platform for dialogue and research but also an active participant in the legislative process. It works tirelessly to inform policymakers, advocate for transparency and accountability in government UAP investigations, and ensure public access to credible information. Through initiatives such as the push for the UAP Disclosure Act and the development of open-source tools for UAP reporting and analysis, UAP Caucus is shaping the landscape of UAP research and public engagement.
In an era where the line between known and unknown is ever-evolving, UAP Caucus embodies the spirit of discovery and the pursuit of truth. It stands as a testament to the power of collective effort and the importance of maintaining an open, informed, and respectful discourse on matters that challenge our understanding of the world.
You can find UAP Caucus at:
Web:
Twitter: @UAPCaucus
You can find Lester at:
Twitter: @lesternare
You can find Ronak at:
Twitter: @ronakpat42
You can find Jim Quirk’s excellent show at:
YouTube:
Spotify:
Twitter: @jimqk
The Good Trouble Show:
Linktree:
Patreon:
YouTube:
Twitter: Instagram: @goodtroubleshow
TikTok:
Facebook:
Threads: @TheGoodTroubleShow
BlueSky: @TheGoodTroubleShow
#ufo
#thegoodtroubleshow
#uap
Matt, I really like your interviews but I gotta admit its a little heavy on the UFO content. Have you ever thought of covering topics outside of that? Like maybe movies, music, or cryptocurrency, or something like that?
Lester is the man. Him and Ronak are really putting the effort in!
38:05 is there any video of the multi day event over Langley by people and their phones, or cameras?
I wonder how many of the Guerilla Skeptics membership are Christians. There is more proof of UFO’s than there is of any of the organized religions. Yet this is the subject they spend so much of their time and energy on debunking. A subject that a very small portion of the world has any interest in. That in and of itself is very telling.
It blows my mind that Wikipedia is accepted as a repository of facts. When I was younger, info sourced from Wikipedia was not accepted for anything. Teachers wouldn’t even accept it in high schools because of how unreliable it is.
Mandating AARO to monitor the UAP issue was like
requiring the Mafia to investigate itself for criminal activity.
..
I don’t know what their budget was ( I saw somewhere that 11 million dollars was requested )
but private US citizens with NO budget have done more and better research than AARO.
There are more thorough and better documented TERM PAPERS on bread mold
than AARO’s 63 page rushed homework submission.
..
But it seems very clear that AARO’s De Facto mission and purpose
with that report was simply to shovel out “more of the same”.
It did not need to be thorough or accurate.
It just needed to get out simple and fast media bites and headlines
that would reinforce an already well entrenched public viewpoint.
(“There are no little green men and anyone paying serious attention to this
UFO thing is a juvenile, gullible crackpot.”)
..
Now . . we’re running into the frustrating wait for more “whistleblower”
testimony.
“When will these soldiers of truth march forward and challenge
the big, bad evil gatekeepers in the Pentagon?”
..
Unfortunately,
we’re seeing verbal maneuvering and language tricks on both sides of the issue.
Let’s stop this bullsh*tting around with semantic games like
defining “first hand witness” as someone who saw a video or photograph.
(The CONTEXT of Daniel Sheehan seeing those microfiche photos in 1977 is more
important than what he saw. His getting special, temporary clearance to see
classified files was at least something that could be traced and verified if
AARO ever intended to actually do so.)
But . . .
Who do we really picture in our heads when we hear “whistleblower” and not
just someone repeating hearsay? What really is a “first hand witness”?
..
I obviously can’t speak for everyone, but I imagine an individual who has worked
in a massively secure facility and had direct, up-close visual observation of
an object or craft that defied known science and then physically handled it, or stepped inside
of it.
..
Or someone who performed an autopsy or interview or examination of
a humanoid being that was very clearly not human.
..
Or someone ( again, in a seriously secure and hidden facility )
who performed rigorous analytical testing of a material that is well beyond
our capabilities to create, and can provide a summary of the data gathered along with
identification of who is in possession of that material and where it was last located.
..
Or a boots-on-the-ground grunt who was dispatched to gather, hide and ship off a downed craft.
..
Very sadly . . . I’m not optimistic at all that we’ll see any such whistleblowing.
Neither reported second-hand from SCIF briefings nor in public congressional hearings conducted under oath.
We’ll see it ( and Have already seen it in spades ) on websites or in video podcasts.
In other words . . . More of the same.
—
Matt, thank you very much for this video, again your work is excellent! So much info is coming to you and so much work for you alone, my advice: build a team, you need it in my opinion.
Does anyone know when the QnAs from Sol will be published?
If there is NHI on this planet, then that is just the reality of the world we live in. Declaring our reality “classified”, or “top secret”, is criminal. Everyone has a right to know about the reality of the world they live in.