2024年 UGLY! NY Times, Skeptics attack UFO research, Avi Loeb with slander and more junk science!

Yet another scientific study has emerged attempting to discredit The Galileo Project and Dr. Avi Loeb! And this time, the NY Times has leaped into the debate in support of the skeptics! But what are the facts?
Does anyone care?
#space #alien #uap

Email the NY Times and demand a retraction!
nytnews@nytimes.com

Please support my channel! EARLY VIDEO RELEASES, DISCORD MEMBERSHIP AND EXCLUSIVE CONTENT PLUS

コメント（8件）

@jona_KardCiv1 より:

2024年3月20日 7:06 AM

The NY Times is a trash rag these days.

返信
@Knossos22 より:

2024年3月20日 7:06 AM

“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”

返信
@SasukeUchiha-ql5jg より:

2024年3月20日 7:06 AM

Bros glazing Avi hard. As a man, could never be me, and what’s this talk of aliens? Are you actively pushing an old psyop that has nothing to backit up? UFOs for example, they’re quite literally ALL terrestrial. You’d be a fool to think otherwise

返信
@VictorFlores-hg2nu より:

2024年3月20日 7:06 AM

Avi loeb has my support and I know he’s debunked a lot of the mainstream explanations you just got read his research and you’ll see what the media ain’t covering.

返信
@AtlasRonin より:

2024年3月20日 7:06 AM

Dr. Loeb and his team should SUE The NY Times and these “experts” for libel and slander. It’s unprofessional for anyone to act and speak this way towards a colleague. Period. They’re the fools in the equation not Dr. Loeb.

返信
@AtlasRonin より:

2024年3月20日 7:06 AM

The New York Times takes its orders from the pentagon and Biden admin. Not reporting truths any longer. Just their narratives.

返信
@VideoSafari7 より:

2024年3月20日 7:06 AM

This is what I sent to the New York times. Feel free to quote, borrow it, or use it for boilerplate:

It is unconscionable that your author “Matt Richtal” should be permitted to speak with the booming voice of the New York Times in such a demeaning and dismissive modality to someone with a PHd in their field. To add insult to injury, Matt Richtal has no particular basis for credibility, lacking any sort of educational or other source of clear, critical insight into the context of this concern.

Indeed, he reads far more like some clown on Fox News than a detached and insightful investigative reporter pursuing a scoop. Further, lacking any sort of critical and systematic perspective on the facts, he continues in his dismissive course, doubling down on his erstwhile perceptions to a point of slanderousness.

On behalf of clear and systematic science; on behalf of people who operate out of positions of reason; I request, no, I demand that the New York Times publish a full page apology for Matt Richter’s ‘story’; and while some might insist that he lose his job, I insist that he not only keep it, but that he is made to address the topic with the diligent attention to detachment and fact be applied that one should anticipate from a good reporter. I’d like to see that with clear references to his sources provided, and then published as a correction to the original article under his own byline. I want to see him, figuratively speaking, eat his words.

I want that asshole to know, in no uncertain terms, what he is kicking dirt over.

It may or may not be true that Dr. Loeb has discovered evidence of an extraterrestrial intelligence, but whether he has or not will not be determined by some jackass reporter determined to spend the good name of the New York Times on 5 of his 15 minutes of fame.

Be the New York Times.

返信
@Wiiillllson151 より:

2024年3月20日 7:06 AM

Seems like the closer we get on this subject the more push back from those involved in hiding it. Atleast we are seeing first hand who are the ones responsible for this cover up! Don’t let them win people. Stay Angry!

返信