2024年 New UFO video released

The US Senate subcommittee on Armed Services held an unclassified briefing with the Director of AARO, or All-domain Anomaly Research Office, and in it they revealed video of an unidentified flying object.

コメント（9件）

@ragingalex_1017 より:

2024年6月2日 12:36 AM

Naa its a soccer ball ⚽

返信
@masakeris より:

2024年6月2日 12:36 AM

These balls are flying for centuries above pne ciy in my country. Just steel looking ball. People got used to it.

返信
@sayittomyfaceidareyou8629 より:

2024年6月2日 12:36 AM

This one over Iraq is exactly the same as the footage from Puerto Rico and the object goes in and out of ocean and then splits into two objects

返信
@user-vw8yz3yw5w より:

2024年6月2日 12:36 AM

Nije samo problem 240p. Kako ona dvojica ljudi izgledaju, ko da su iz animiranog filma sa figurama, koje kao da su od gline.
A hodaju, kao da su pijani. Idu kao napred, a opet ne stignu nigde?

返信
@Justkillinchillin より:

2024年6月2日 12:36 AM

The ufo is watching USA warcrimes

返信
@J-Pow より:

2024年6月2日 12:36 AM

It’s not necessarily that the cameras are crappy. It’s the fact that the military requests ridiculous retention times of 30 years or more, and so compromises have to be made on long-term archival data to achieve that, which often results in compression of data, or dropped frames.

返信
@billybreathes8088 より:

2024年6月2日 12:36 AM

The camera is moving. ITs a balloon going 10miles per hour with the wind.

返信
@billybreathes8088 より:

2024年6月2日 12:36 AM

lol its not CNN. What a fake. ITs a balloon.

返信
@RobertAlston-lj3ot より:

2024年6月2日 12:36 AM

Raise your hand if you dont know that we can now anylize the chemical signatures of nearby stars to find the trace elements that show probable life signatures !” If you dont know about our advancements in this field i suggest you research it ,otherwise this will be a pointless commentary to you . If now we’ve reached the point in our technological developement where we can make reasonable assumptions of life based on chemical signatures from other star systems ,how much more could we do once we refine our techniques in a hundred years , and with new technologies ?” How long after we are confident that weve found promising signatures that we’ll send probes toward those destinations ?” Before i get the captian obviouses of” you tube” let me remind everyone weve already sent probes out to the furthest reaches of our solar system in the seventies !” Many who originally worked on those missions have passed away already . Requiring anyone who send probes out to be alive when they achieve their mission has never been a requirement of doing the mission !” We wont wait to achieve super luminal propulsion to send probes to habitable ststems . All we will need is an ability to sustain travel . Solar sails , ionic propulsion are just a few technologies that comes to mind . I am making a bold assessment based on what us humans would likely do if we had strong indications of probable life in a distant solar system . Our planet has generated those chemical signitures for well over a billion years . From microbial to complex life in the last 700 million years . Imagine a species detecting our life signitures and sending more and more advanced monitering systems to watch our developement ?” After so many millions of years theyd probably have a permanent biological presence in our solar system to conduct experiments or even terriform our planet for optimum suitability for complex terrestrial life . As far as we humans know , we are the only life in this region of our galaxy . But we could’ve just been the new species who cohabitates this world with an older permanant colony that predates our arrival by millions of years ,hidden within our oceans and inner crust . As well as our other planetary bodies ,studing us ,tweeking and upgrading our DNA , or just being that hidden safety valve we are only becoming aware that shares our planet and solar system . Extraterrestrials may not have to travel across lightyears to get here ,they may predate us here and only now letting us know of their presence. Just a theory of mine and food for thought . There are more ways to look at this phenomenon than just one .

返信