2024年 James Fox THREATENED By Secret UFO Group About Jason Sands

Patrick discusses Filmmaker James Fox’s recent tweet about ‘UFO Whistleblower’ Jason Sands and an ambiguous tweet from James about a secret UFO group who basically threatened him if he says “the wrong thing at the wrong time.”

We also look at a clip from the latest episode of Weaponized Podcast and hear Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp’s thoughts on Jason “Jay” Sands. Apparently they spoke with “Jay” well over a year ago.

SHOW NOTES:

SOURCE LINKS:

James Fox Tweet About Jason Sands:

James Fox Tweet:

Weaponized Podcast:

Vetted Video (Interview With Danny Sheehan):

Vetted Videos About Jason Sands:

コメント（9件）

@user-uj2gf7ul2n より:

2024年5月4日 1:35 AM

Matey, the whole description of this video is done under the guise of ‘facts’ but is merely your interpretation of the tweet James Fox put out. You want to point out the “little details”? Not once did you say that he said he “risked” being thrown out of the circle. You immediately arrive at the most cynical perspective which also happens to be enough to generate the desired click bait slogan.
As someone with such a wide following you actually have a responsibility to report truthful things. Not once did James even remotely suggest that he has been threatened and it is dangerous to set pretenses to ongoing matters especially of such importance. I love hearing differnt opinions but let’s just stick to the facts from now on, cool?

返信
@user-wy8ts3kn4i より:

2024年5月4日 1:35 AM

Sounds like a bunch of self serving snotty frat boy shit

返信
@justinbirkholz7814 より:

2024年5月4日 1:35 AM

Just another Doty.

返信
@user-gm2cj1om7s より:

2024年5月4日 1:35 AM

True disclosure can only come from the private sector in my opinion. We must assume a good percentage of ufo community’s “Leaders” are bought and paid for just like politicians. By corbels own logic bob Lazar has no physical evidence eighter. Element 115 was mentioned in a science magazine years before Lazar talked about it. That hand scanner is in close encounters of the third kind. Russian Satellite photos show ” s4″ is not a mountain face for any doors to even be camouflaged. Lazar is just as questionable as corbel is.

返信
@edwardkipp4911 より:

2024年5月4日 1:35 AM

Everyone seems to be jumping at the chance to say Jayson Sands is lying, but the things he has said that ARE verifiable are true and that carries some weight towards the other parts of the story… remember there are keepers of the secrets that are doing whatever they can to discredit him and get everyone to ignore him. Just listen to the entire story and don’t throw out the baby with the bathwater.

返信
@user-gm2cj1om7s より:

2024年5月4日 1:35 AM

Seems like they push out some guy every few months to keep our attention on THEIR narrative. I have my doubts about lou aswell, I don’t believe he’s all bad but he is pushing a narrative. In my opinion corbel is Cia by now. You would be absolutely shocked at how many people get a check from them to stay in the boundaries of a set narrative. A whistle blower is not a person that gets every word approved by the alphabet agencies.

返信
@natevallo227 より:

2024年5月4日 1:35 AM

This topic is an iceberg. The vast majority of information is exchanged out of public view. I myself, as I think is the case with most researchers, experiencers ect. have a duality. I have the public side. Info I can speak about. Then there’s the other 80%. Info I can’t speak on. For various reasons. This is the process. It may feel at times we haven’t gained any ground. But look back from where it started to where it is today. We’ve made huge strides. Especially in the past 6-7 years. Keep up the good work! Stay optimistic! The time will come when info comes to light that will blow the lid off our current views!

返信
@ClericChris より:

2024年5月4日 1:35 AM

The first whistle blower who said they had a personal interaction was always going to be called a BSer.

返信
@ClericChris より:

2024年5月4日 1:35 AM

Jason or any other whistle blowers need to be put into 4 categories. Grade A seems legit and has receipts to 99% of claims. Grade B seems legit has, has receipts for 50-99% and verified by Grade A. Grade C, has less than 25% receipts but has Grade A verification. Grade DD, no receipts but verified by Grade A or B. Grade D, no receipts, but seems plausible. After that assume they are full of shit. Grush is grade B. Jason Grade D. Bob Lesar from F to DD over the years.

返信