Newly released video footage shows “tic tac” UFOs that U.S. sailors observed in February 2023 coming from the water off the southern California coast. Ben Hansen, host of “UFO Witness” on Discovery+, tells “Banfield” that UFO activity has long been observed in the area, which features a deep-sea channel.
#UFOs #TicTac #Paranormal
Ashleigh Banfield is *the* definitive authority on the nation’s biggest true crime stories. A veteran award-winning journalist, Ashleigh brings a sharp focus to the crime stories gripping America, distilling facts and analyzing context in a way which captures viewers’ interests and imaginations. No one knows the prosecution and the defendants’ cases better than BANFIELD, all the while keeping the victim at the heart of every story we tell – just another reason NewsNation is truly News for All Americans.
Weeknights at 10p/9C. #Banfiel
Some of your comments make me want to cry
This is the ultimate national security issue. If they can reappear miles away that means they can have a nuke 60 miles off the coast of California and have it reappear in downtown Los Angeles.
Nexus to Disclosure doesn’t make sense grammatically guys
i wish everyone on this planet would get more interested on this issue
Thank you News Nation for continuing to cover this.
Who”s video is the first one? Says Jeremy Corbell. His bio calls him a film maker and ufologist.
This video is packed with unfounded claims, logical leaps, and misleading representations that conflate unverified anecdote with evidence, and ambiguity with certainty. Here’s a clear and reasoned breakdown of the falsehoods and fallacies throughout.
It heavily relies on anecdotal evidence, speculation, and unsupported claims, all of which are framed as compelling proof of advanced or alien technology. For instance, statements about the Tic Tac having “no propulsion, no wings, no exhaust” are based on low-resolution infrared footage, which by nature cannot show fine detail — so absence of visual evidence is being misrepresented as evidence of absence. Similarly, claims that the objects “disappeared from radar” are treated as if they literally vanished, when in reality this could be due to any number of mundane causes, such as radar limitations, interference, or filtering. These leaps in logic reflect a classic argument from ignorance: “We don’t know what happened, so it must be something extraordinary.”
Further, the narrative introduces a false dilemma — that the objects must be either alien or secret military tech — while ignoring far more likely explanations like drones, balloons, or sensor artifacts. It also misuses repetition, implying that seeing similar shapes repeatedly confirms their significance, when in fact this is just confirmation bias. The claim that these objects were “clearly synchronized” or “communicating” is pure speculation based on unverified testimony, not on objective evidence.
Most notably, the segment lacks any raw sensor data, chain of custody, or independent analysis. The video itself is just a secondhand recording of a screen. Despite this, the presentation treats these fragments as serious evidence while making grand assertions — such as eyewitnesses seeing a “city of light” rising from the ocean — without offering a single corroborating image, log, or sensor reading. In short, the transcript relies on sensationalism rather than skepticism, and confuses mystery with proof.
They are humans from the future, sent back in time to witness Trump/Krasnov almost completely destroy the Earth in WW3.
I might never go swimming in the ocean or lake ever again .