2024年 Plane crew member recounts ‘Tic Tac’ UFO encounter | Banfield

Ben Hansen, host of “UFO Witness” on Discovery+, has interviewed a crew member from the Department of Homeland Security flight that took evasive action to avoid striking a “Tic Tac”-shaped UFO in February 2024 over California. Hansen joins “Banfield” with computer animation that depicts the encounter.

#UFOs #Paranormal #DHS

Ashleigh Banfield is *the* definitive authority on the nation’s biggest true crime stories. A veteran award-winning journalist, Ashleigh brings a sharp focus to the crime stories gripping America, distilling facts and analyzing context in a way which captures viewers’ interests and imaginations. No one knows the prosecution and the defendants’ cases better than BANFIELD, all the while keeping the victim at the heart of every story we tell – just another reason NewsNation is truly News for All Americans.
Weeknights at 10p/9C. #Banfield

コメント（9件）

@phil8114 より:

2025年4月25日 6:55 AM

Listen, i have seen one of these (much bigger) up close and personal. It’s a long story for a few seconds of incredible so I won’t get into it here. But I thing I will say, is I got a vibe, even though what I saw was a perfect white sphere the size of a high end camper, that it wasn’t a craft. I got a vibe it was a lifeform. There was no psychic connection, no lights no sound, none of the cool stuff you’d hope to see when seeing something like this; but it was real. It was solid and moving over my head n a perfect line, consistent speed. It was a ball. A ball cannot fly; it was doing something else, something we don’t understand. I have a theory and much more but i don’t want to write (nor would anyone want to read) a whole page about it here. I was close, like if it was a plane I could have read any letter or numbers on it, even the small one’s. There were none. I went mental looking for what I saw all over the internet and found only one thing that seemed to be exactly what I saw. There was a guy on or about the same day who got a few shots of the thing I saw over lake Ontario near Toronto. I tried to contact him and he never responded. Here’s the link to his video.
He says it was a “Black spere” however I think that was a matter of perspective and he only noticed it later in his pictures. It looked exactly like a 20 or 25 foot cue ball. It’s verry hard to stop writing about this thing, I NEED to see it again and probably never will…

返信
@martinmclean4801 より:

2025年4月25日 6:55 AM

This is a good one.

返信
@KeepAnOpenMind より:

2025年4月25日 6:55 AM

But those are the FAA approved ones!

返信
@ramiroavila9374 より:

2025年4月25日 6:55 AM

Fake News

返信
@mikelang3372 より:

2025年4月25日 6:55 AM

Keep getting the truth out there !! One day it’s not gonna be so close !!

返信
@VolkasSur より:

2025年4月25日 6:55 AM

By the way they’re describing it on the image.. It could have been a very slow flying drone..

返信
@SkyTurnsPurplePhotography より:

2025年4月25日 6:55 AM

It was an unidentified flying object the size of a football?! That’s tiny. No way the pilot saw it off in the distance, then saw it immediately accelerate and had time to bump up the wing.

It would have to be bigger than a football. At that altitude, the air is relatively clear, and pilots have good eyes, but the object would have to be large enough to have been seen far out in the distance.
Footballs are tiny. To see any single object coming at you, that size, you’d have to be moving slow, the object slow, and you’d need to be close and give your eyes time to focus on it.
Whatever it was, I doubt it was that small.
This talking head UFO show producer embellished by claiming he’s a pilot who does this with birds. First, birds with their wings spread are far larger than a football. Second, what was the producer’s speed and altitude? Doubtful it was at 20k feet, at the same speed. At 20k feet, you’re not bumbling along like a civilian plane made of cheap fiberglass.
That comparison to sell the story is ludicrous.
On its own, the story is fascinating. Did the pilots provide the actual radar information so estimates could be made about speed and velocity?
If the object is moving at Mach 3 or whatever, that makes it less likely it was as small as a football.
The object was either much larger when it was far away, which is how they initially spotted it, then it shrunk as it closed in, or it was moving slower than estimated and was initially closer, or the object was actually further off their 1:00 than they realized and moved diagonally toward their 5:00, but appeared to be the same size because it was seen at an angle.
Because of parallax, did it actually go under the wing or appear to?
I don’t think the producer needs to embellish to sell it.
On its own, it’s a fascinating encounter, but these are not Navy pilots, though they are trained observers.
Really hard to determine what happened without radar info and video to approximate the actual size relative to anything.
There are a lot of missing details in stories like this that seem to suspiciously never get leaked to gatekeeper journalists.

The Navy pilot encounters are the best incidents we have to date, but they are intentionally incomplete. They lack the radar information, deck logs, and the incident reports written out by each of the pilots.
That information has never been produced.

The bigger question to ask is why these are always incomplete cases with limited information “leaked” to gatekeeper journalists?

返信
@Baul_Punyan より:

2025年4月25日 6:55 AM

Prob one of Joe Montanya’s footballs.

返信
@vtr8427 より:

2025年4月25日 6:55 AM

Evidence with real pictures please. Otherwise it didn’t happen.

返信